thoughts and quotations from Huxley, A. 1954, "Doors of perception."
Huxley, A.
1954, "Doors of perception." Chatto & Windus ltd, Great Britain.
Aldous
huxleys account of his experience using peyotl/mescaline and the effect on
consciousness and perception.
Is peyotl a
source of releasing ones conscious, the pharmacology suggests similarities
between it and adrenalin, also supposing a possible link with schizophrenia as
a chemical disorder, Chemical disorder due to psychological distress affecting
the adrenals.
Are all
psychological disorders similarly chemical based? Depression could be a
chemical imbalance hence the use of reuptake serotonin inhibitors.
Adrenochrome and serotonin both naturally occurring chemicals. Is consciousness
merely chemical? I hope not!
"We
live together, we act on, and react to, one another; but always and in all
circumstances we are by ourselves. The martyrs go hand in hand into the arena;
they are crucified alone. Embraced, the lovers desperately try to fuse their insulated
ecstasies into a single self-transcendence; in vain. By its very nature every
embodied spirit is doomed to suffer and enjoy in solitude. Sensations,
feelings, insights, fancies - all these are private and, except through symbols
and at second hand, in communicable......" Huxley, A. 1954. Pp3.
I myself
have felt this urge and unhappiness at the impossibility at transcending the
limitations of the physical, I deeply wish to break out of myself, the
isolation of being trapped inside my mind causes suffering to the extent that I
have to rely on two different antidepressants. Which in itself helps but also
mutes me.
Istigkeit
"isness" the being of platonic philosophy. Except that Plato
seperating being from becoming.
"Roses
iris... Signified nothing more nothing less than what they were- a transience
that was yet eternal life, a perpetual perishing that was at the same time pure
being, a bundle of minute particles, unique particulaurs in which, by some
unspeakable and self evident paradox was to be seen the divine source of all
existence." Pp8
Beatific
vision
Sat chit
ananda
Being
awareness bliss
Braque and
juan Gris
Still
life.
C d broad
quote. Pp11
When you
paint or carve drapery, you are painting or carving forms which for all
practical purposes, are non-representational - the kind of of unconditioned
forms on which artists even in the most naturalistic tradition like to let
themselves go."Continues.
Pp18
Reflections
on drapery page 17 to 21
"For
the artist as for the mescaline taker, draperies are living hieroglyphs that
stand in some perculiaur expressive way for the u fathomable mystery of pure
being.
In reference
to Judith's skirt(Botticelli)
And his
flannel trousers,
"Enough
to delight generation after generation of beholders, enough to make them
understand at least a little of the true significance of what in our pathetic
imbecility we call "mere things" and disregard in favour of
television."
(Raphael
notes.)
"These
are the things one should look at. Things without pretentions, satisfied to be
merely themselves, sufficient in their suchness, not acting a part, not trying,
insanely to go it alone, in isolation of the dharma body, in luciferian
defiance of the grace of God."
Vermeer, artist
On
reflection of what was seen when Huxley closed his eyes " and as I looked,
it became very clear that this five and ten cent ship was in some way connected
with human pretentions. This suffocating interior of a dime store ship was my
own personal self; these gimcrack mobiles of tin and plastic were my personal
contributions to the universe."
Pp29
"What
it had allowed me to perceive, inside, was not the dharma body in images, but
my own mind; not archetypal suchness, but a set of symbols- in other words, a
home made substitute of suchness.
Page 31
reflection on landscape painting. Tao, Buddhist, zen.
Christian as
portrait
Seurat
landscape but adiantum on being of the system not poetry.
Blake and
constable drawing response.
Is focusing on the inner or
subconscious limiting. By observing the outward world can a sense of whole and
suchness be revealed? Page 32.
Where do the observations come
from?
In my work, do I focus on the
inner self? Does the art work function as a documentation of a process of
interaction of the physical. Is it better directly observe the world and
respond (life drawings) iis the literal non-pretence of mark making without
subject matter a form of my own physical reaction to the
environment/nature/reality. By recording things such as date, time location
express that experience?
This increases my interest in
duration, labour and enviromental effects. For example. If you were to make a
series of works, using the same formula, like in 35 000 events but done in
various locations or over certain time frames, one drawing every hour in a day
have recognisable effect? Also a further version, by not using formula but
instead using a freer form of painting but using similar enviromental effects
like largely different locations the decisions made within those varying places
would cause varying results?
Page 43,
discussing restrictions on the natural bounty of concioussness altering
pharmacology, only alcohol and tabbacco unrestricted.
"The
urge to escape from selfhood and the enviroment is in almost everyone almost
all the time."
Links;
The ordinary
George perec
exhausting a place.
Comments