A reflection on being asked to consider "Writing as a Practice, Writing as a Process."
I have felt that writing has been relatively inaccessible to
me, whether this being a result of some disorder like dyslexia (which I am in
the process of being tested for) or a result of the comments throughout my life
on the quality of my writing, accusations of laziness being the typical
statement. I have always held a strong
passion for stories and enjoyed analyzing poetry to find the deeper meaning. I
think I have had issues with my ability to express myself in writing or
speaking, finding that my choice of words have limitations to convey what I am attempting
to communicate. I suppose this is why art has played such a major role in my
life. The use of visual poetics helping to communicate things I was unable to
speak. The use of masks, rules and borders, though being used unconsciously at
the time, on reflection have fairly unsubtle messages behind them.
But this issue of writing has remained, I don’t feel
confident about my writing but in starting this MA, I have found it necessary
to find a way of clarifying what my ideas are and where they have come from. I
did not make any conscious decision to write in the way I am currently, but it
feels natural to, as with my portfolio the writing seems to act as a
documentation of the performance of thought.
I have been surprised how writing (coupled with verbal
communication) has begun a sort of metamorphosis, from an isolated, detached,
inward looking, image basis, I feel that I am developing toward a balanced
inward and outward, reflective and critical, image and language based way of
thinking, this metamorphosis has allowed me an insight into my past process of
thinking which was otherwise inaccessible and already I feel responses
resulting from it.
I find myself reflecting back on one of my earlier works, A
large scale circle with 350 000 dots of ink, titled ‘Itself within Itself.’
(2010), in which I was attempting to describe a significance/insignificance
relationship. The dots of ink are reflections of the whole they contribute to,
without their presence the whole would not be the same whole, but when focusing
on a single dot it becomes a sort of superposition of
significance/insignificance. Alone it is a dot of ink, other than its physical
composition its role is fairly arbitrary. In its singularity it has very little
relative qualities, but when placed in proximity of other dots of ink
relationships start happening, a process and system begins, eventually leading
to a whole made of this constant process building system of relationships, it
is impossible to see the whole without considering its individual parts but by
focusing on one of these parts you will learn very little of the whole, it is
the relationships that make the both the whole and individual significant.
In implementing writing in to my approach to my practice,
there is a sort of mirroring effect going on, similar to the process of the
dots of ink, I have begun a kind of automatic writing that is functioning as a
way of recording specific thoughts when they arise. I mark down these thoughts
in quick hand writing, using a pencil, reflective of the immediacy of the
action of making a mark, each word in itself arbitrary but full of potential
when combined with the other words in a sentence, paragraph or essay. The word
comes alive and active, it takes on a meaning but that meaning is limited by
the borders of the statement. It exists as a singular. When combined with
additional writings it takes on new form, filling a gap in the whole of my
practice. I m surprised at what I have
been able to achieve in the short time I have started using writing, it has
been interesting to see how it has affected me in my transition from my
previous way of working to the academic setting, but also in its function,
writing may be transitioning into a part of my practice, its similarities to
the action of mark making being very clear to me. It would seem that in light
of this similarity, it would make sense to reject the idea of separation between
them, both being practice and both being a part of the process of making and
informing that practice. If the process of events unfolding is something I
consider as of high importance in my work, by not attempting to review the very
process I go through to make that work would be detrimental.
Comments